Opoint vs Mediastack: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Opoint (4.2/5) edges ahead of Mediastack (3.8/5) overall. Opoint is the better choice for monitoring platforms and AML teams needing non-English coverage. Mediastack is the stronger option for hobby projects and low-volume apps on a tight budget. The right pick depends on your budget, how much history you need and whether you need full text.
Opoint vs Mediastack: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Opoint | Mediastack |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2001 | 2015 |
| HQ | Norway; owned by Infomedia (Denmark) | Vienna, Austria (apilayer); owned by Idera |
| Team size | Not publicly disclosed | Part of Idera |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage | Paid plans from $24.99 with commercial use and historical data |
| Pricing model | Custom licence | Monthly request plans |
| Entry price | Custom quote | $24.99/mo |
| Formats & SDKs | REST API, JSON, XML | REST API, JSON |
| Typical uses | Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services, Marketing & PR | News & content apps, Marketing & PR |
Opoint vs Mediastack: overview
Opoint
Opoint has supplied news data since 2001 and belongs to Infomedia, the Nordic media-monitoring group owned by the Danish publishers JP/Politiken and Berlingske. It sells itself to monitoring platforms as their data supplier, with 250,000+ sources across 230 jurisdictions and 135 languages, roughly 60% of them non-English (per company website; independently unverifiable). Data arrives through an API or a push feed in JSON, XML or CSV. A separate adverse-media product targets anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) checks, and all pricing is quote-based.
Mediastack
Mediastack is one of the apilayer products, alongside ipstack and weatherstack. apilayer was founded in Vienna in 2015 by Julian and Paul Zehetmayr and acquired by the US software group Idera in January 2021. The API aggregates live and historical news from 7,500+ sources in 13 languages, filtered by country, category, language and keyword. The free plan allows 100 requests a month, and paid plans run from $24.99 for 10,000 requests to $249.99 for 250,000. Its source list is far smaller than the big crawlers here, and it adds no enrichment beyond basic metadata.
Features: Opoint vs Mediastack
| Capability | Opoint | Mediastack |
|---|---|---|
| Full article text | ✓ | ✗ |
| Historical archive | ✓ | ✓ |
| NLP enrichment | ✓ | ✗ |
| Story/event clustering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Licensed publisher content | ✗ | ✗ |
| Streaming or webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free access | ✗ | ✓ |
Formats and SDKs: Opoint vs Mediastack
| Format / SDK | Opoint | Mediastack |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python SDK | N/A | N/A |
| Node.js SDK | N/A | N/A |
| Webhooks | N/A | N/A |
| WebSocket | N/A | N/A |
| MCP server | N/A | N/A |
| S3/bulk delivery | N/A | N/A |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Opoint vs Mediastack
| Criterion | Opoint | Mediastack |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Custom quote | $24.99/mo |
| Pricing model | Custom licence | Monthly request plans |
| Access models | Enterprise contract | Free tier, Monthly plans |
| Price transparency | Quote only | Public price |
| Price tier | Enterprise / quote | Budget |
Who each API suits: Opoint vs Mediastack
| Dimension | Opoint | Mediastack |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer type | Enterprise only | Individuals to enterprise |
| Typical uses | Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services | News & content apps, Marketing & PR |
| Example use cases | Powering a media-monitoring product with global coverage. Adverse-media screening for AML and KYC. | A news ticker or category feed for a small website. A learning project that needs commercial rights cheaply. |
| How you get access | Enterprise contract | Free tier |
Opoint vs Mediastack: pros and cons
| Opoint | |
|---|---|
| + | About 60% non-English coverage is unusually strong for Europe, Asia and Africa |
| + | Matching articles arrive in under seven minutes on average (per company website) |
| + | Push feeds and CSV or XML output suit platforms that ingest in bulk |
| + | Two decades of supplying monitoring companies |
| - | No public pricing or self-serve developer tier |
| - | Sold to platforms and enterprises, so individual developers are not the audience |
| - | Its owner Infomedia is itself a monitoring vendor, which matters if you compete with it |
| Mediastack | |
|---|---|
| + | One of the cheapest paid entries among general news APIs, at $24.99 a month |
| + | Same conventions as other apilayer APIs, which helps if you already use one |
| + | Historical news included on paid plans |
| + | Short docs with copy-paste examples |
| - | Only 7,500 sources and 13 languages |
| - | The free plan is 100 requests a month, which runs out in a day of testing |
| - | Descriptions only, with no full text, sentiment or entities |
Who should choose Opoint?
A typical fit: powering a media-monitoring product with global coverage.
Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage. Paid access is quote-based. Typical uses: Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services, Marketing & PR.
Who should choose Mediastack?
A typical fit: a news ticker or category feed for a small website.
Paid plans from $24.99 with commercial use and historical data. Paid access starts at $24.99/mo. Typical uses: News & content apps, Marketing & PR.
Decision matrix: Opoint vs Mediastack
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want to start free before paying | Mediastack |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Mediastack |
| You need full article text in the response | Opoint |
| You need years of historical news | Both |
| You need licensed premium or wire content | Neither; look at Factiva, AP or LexisNexis |
| You are wiring news into an LLM agent | Both work through plain REST calls |
Use case fit: Opoint vs Mediastack
| Use case | Opoint fit | Mediastack fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Media monitoring | Strong | Limited | Opoint |
| Risk & compliance | Strong | Limited | Opoint |
| Financial services | Strong | Limited | Opoint |
| Marketing & PR | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| News & content apps | Limited | Strong | Mediastack |
Verdict: Opoint vs Mediastack
Opoint (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice as a news data source. Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage.
Mediastack (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need a learning project that needs commercial rights cheaply. If your situation matches that, Mediastack is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Opoint vs Mediastack FAQ
Is Opoint better than Mediastack?
Opoint (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Opoint's strongest advantage: about 60% non-English coverage is unusually strong for Europe, Asia and Africa. Mediastack's strongest advantage: one of the cheapest paid entries among general news APIs, at $24.99 a month.
How do Opoint and Mediastack differ in pricing?
Opoint: custom licence, priced by quote. Mediastack: monthly request plans, with paid access from $24.99/mo. Only Mediastack offers free access.
Which is better for enterprise: Opoint or Mediastack?
Opoint sells enterprise contracts with negotiated volume and SLA terms. Neither carries licensed publisher content, so check copyright terms before republishing anything.
What are the main differences between Opoint and Mediastack?
What sets Opoint apart: built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage. What sets Mediastack apart: paid plans from $24.99 with commercial use and historical data. They also differ on entry price (Custom quote vs $24.99/mo) and typical uses (Media monitoring, Risk & compliance vs News & content apps, Marketing & PR).
Verify all details directly with each API before making a decision.