Opoint vs GDELT Project: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Opoint (4.2/5) edges ahead of GDELT Project (4.0/5) overall. Opoint is the better choice for monitoring platforms and AML teams needing non-English coverage. GDELT Project is the stronger option for researchers and data scientists with no budget. The right pick depends on your budget, how much history you need and whether you need full text.
Opoint vs GDELT Project: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Opoint | GDELT Project |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2001 | 2013 |
| HQ | Norway; owned by Infomedia (Denmark) | Open research project (no commercial HQ) |
| Team size | Not publicly disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage | Free global coverage with 15-minute updates and BigQuery access |
| Pricing model | Custom licence | Free |
| Entry price | Custom quote | Free |
| Formats & SDKs | REST API, JSON, XML | REST API, JSON, CSV |
| Typical uses | Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services, Marketing & PR | Research & academia, Risk & compliance, Media monitoring |
Opoint vs GDELT Project: overview
Opoint
Opoint has supplied news data since 2001 and belongs to Infomedia, the Nordic media-monitoring group owned by the Danish publishers JP/Politiken and Berlingske. It sells itself to monitoring platforms as their data supplier, with 250,000+ sources across 230 jurisdictions and 135 languages, roughly 60% of them non-English (per company website; independently unverifiable). Data arrives through an API or a push feed in JSON, XML or CSV. A separate adverse-media product targets anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) checks, and all pricing is quote-based.
GDELT Project
The GDELT Project, created by Kalev Leetaru, is an open research database that monitors broadcast, print and web news worldwide in more than 65 languages and publishes updates every 15 minutes. Its DOC 2.0 API searches recent coverage and returns article lists and timelines, while bulk event and knowledge-graph files can be queried in Google BigQuery. The main APIs are free and need no key. What you get back is metadata and links, so you still have to fetch and parse each page yourself.
Features: Opoint vs GDELT Project
| Capability | Opoint | GDELT Project |
|---|---|---|
| Full article text | ✓ | ✗ |
| Historical archive | ✓ | ✓ |
| NLP enrichment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Story/event clustering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Licensed publisher content | ✗ | ✗ |
| Streaming or webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free access | ✗ | ✓ |
Formats and SDKs: Opoint vs GDELT Project
| Format / SDK | Opoint | GDELT Project |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python SDK | N/A | N/A |
| Node.js SDK | N/A | N/A |
| Webhooks | N/A | N/A |
| WebSocket | N/A | N/A |
| MCP server | N/A | N/A |
| S3/bulk delivery | N/A | N/A |
| BigQuery | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Opoint vs GDELT Project
| Criterion | Opoint | GDELT Project |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Custom quote | Free |
| Pricing model | Custom licence | Free |
| Access models | Enterprise contract | Open data |
| Price transparency | Quote only | Public price |
| Price tier | Enterprise / quote | Free |
Who each API suits: Opoint vs GDELT Project
| Dimension | Opoint | GDELT Project |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer type | Enterprise only | Individuals to enterprise |
| Typical uses | Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services | Research & academia, Risk & compliance, Media monitoring |
| Example use cases | Powering a media-monitoring product with global coverage. Adverse-media screening for AML and KYC. | Academic studies of global media coverage. Geopolitical risk dashboards built in BigQuery. |
| How you get access | Enterprise contract | Open data |
Opoint vs GDELT Project: pros and cons
| Opoint | |
|---|---|
| + | About 60% non-English coverage is unusually strong for Europe, Asia and Africa |
| + | Matching articles arrive in under seven minutes on average (per company website) |
| + | Push feeds and CSV or XML output suit platforms that ingest in bulk |
| + | Two decades of supplying monitoring companies |
| - | No public pricing or self-serve developer tier |
| - | Sold to platforms and enterprises, so individual developers are not the audience |
| - | Its owner Infomedia is itself a monitoring vendor, which matters if you compete with it |
| GDELT Project | |
|---|---|
| + | Completely free, bulk files and BigQuery tables included |
| + | Machine-translated coverage across 65+ languages, which is rare at any price |
| + | Event coding (who did what to whom, and where) supports geopolitical analysis |
| + | Fresh data every 15 minutes |
| - | No full article text, only URLs, metadata and derived signals |
| - | No SLA, commercial support or guaranteed uptime |
| - | Research-grade data structures take time to understand |
Who should choose Opoint?
A typical fit: powering a media-monitoring product with global coverage.
Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage. Paid access is quote-based. Typical uses: Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services, Marketing & PR.
Who should choose GDELT Project?
A typical fit: academic studies of global media coverage.
Free global coverage with 15-minute updates and BigQuery access. Paid access starts at Free. Typical uses: Research & academia, Risk & compliance, Media monitoring.
Decision matrix: Opoint vs GDELT Project
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want to start free before paying | GDELT Project |
| Your budget is at the lower end | GDELT Project |
| You need full article text in the response | Opoint |
| You need years of historical news | Both |
| You need licensed premium or wire content | Neither; look at Factiva, AP or LexisNexis |
| You are wiring news into an LLM agent | Both work through plain REST calls |
Use case fit: Opoint vs GDELT Project
| Use case | Opoint fit | GDELT Project fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Media monitoring | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Risk & compliance | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Financial services | Strong | Limited | Opoint |
| Marketing & PR | Strong | Limited | Opoint |
| Research & academia | Limited | Strong | GDELT Project |
Verdict: Opoint vs GDELT Project
Opoint (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice as a news data source. Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage.
GDELT Project (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need geopolitical risk dashboards built in BigQuery. If your situation matches that, GDELT Project is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Opoint vs GDELT Project FAQ
Is Opoint better than GDELT Project?
Opoint (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Opoint's strongest advantage: about 60% non-English coverage is unusually strong for Europe, Asia and Africa. GDELT Project's strongest advantage: completely free, bulk files and BigQuery tables included.
How do Opoint and GDELT Project differ in pricing?
Opoint: custom licence, priced by quote. GDELT Project: free, with paid access from Free. Only GDELT Project offers free access.
Which is better for enterprise: Opoint or GDELT Project?
Opoint sells enterprise contracts with negotiated volume and SLA terms. Neither carries licensed publisher content, so check copyright terms before republishing anything.
What are the main differences between Opoint and GDELT Project?
What sets Opoint apart: built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage. What sets GDELT Project apart: free global coverage with 15-minute updates and BigQuery access. They also differ on entry price (Custom quote vs Free) and typical uses (Media monitoring, Risk & compliance vs Research & academia, Risk & compliance).
Verify all details directly with each API before making a decision.